That which is untouched, is unloved

How we define ‘nature’ defines our relation with nature, Emma Marris argues. She invites us to take a different perspective on environmental care. In a way one could say she advocates for a child’s perspective on nature. I think the point she makes is worth considering. We need to get back in touch with nature, we need to get our children to be in touch with nature. Because “that which is untouched, is unloved.” Education, as so often when humanity faces fundamental problems, is of key importance here.

See Emma Marris’ TED talk here.

(For a more in-depth discussion of and challenge to Western concepts of nature and the distinctions we make between the natural and the human, I recommend reading this book.)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s